View Full Essay Words: His duplicity teamed with skilled rhetoric earns him political support from the masses whereas Brutus builds his political discourse and strategy of action on the ideal of virtue and the absence of personal interest in politics.
Julius Caesar explores the dangers and attractions of both republicanism and monarchy, revealing many parallels between ancient Rome and Elizabethan England. In the play, Brutus considers a monarchy so dangerous he would rather kill one of his closest friends than risk allowing him to become a tyrannical ruler.
In doing so, he is following the edict of his predecessor Lucius Brutus, who, after defeating the oppressive Tarquin kings in BCE, made the public swear an oath never to allow any one man to become king of Rome again.
From then on, the city was governed by two consuls who were democratically elected every year by citizens and advised by a Senate.
The evolution of Roman government developed through the back and forth struggle between the land-owning patricians prominent families who traced their origins back to Roman foundations and the plebeians, or commoners, who consistently demanded more rights and representation.
While Brutus acts for what he believes is the good of Rome, his vision of a republican government is presented as a beautiful ideal that is impractical for the real world. Although Julius Caesar expresses notions of democratic freedom, it questions whether that freedom can be realistically implemented.
The failure of Brutus to sell the public on the concepts of the republic serves as a critique of republicanism: In the play, Brutus repeatedly fails to reconcile his ethics with the strategic demands of politics.
Opportunism and shrewdness characterized most clearly by Mark Antony always prevail over lofty ideals. Julius Caesar does not entirely side with the single-ruler approach to government, either for ancient Rome or Renaissance England.
Caesar has obvious flaws; he is physically ill, conceited, and stubborn. Once he dies, Rome is paralyzed by bloody factionalism.
The death of a monarch or ruler, even an imperfect one, leads only to greater instability and bloodshed. More than simple indictment or approval of any one form of government, Julius Caesar functions best as a cautionary tale, outlining the disastrous consequences of a high-profile assassination, however noble in intention.
In many ways, Julius Caesar draws parallels between ancient Rome and the political discourse of Elizabethan England. Like Caesar, Queen Elizabeth had no direct heirs, and with her mental and physical health in decline, the question of succession was fraught.
The Roman civil wars in Julius Caesar would have served as a sober warning of the discord England would see should an assassination attempt succeed.Feb 15, · Julius Caesar Essays (Examples) of his power enabled him to appear to be an office-holder with limited Caesar lives his life as any ruler would -- he has no.
A Comparative Analysis of Julius Caesar and Augustus Words | 3 Pages. More about Augustus Caesar: The Greatest Ruler in the Ancient World Essay. Julius Caesar. The conspirators charge Caesar with ambition, Take the Analysis of Major Characters Quick Quiz. Previous Brutus Next Antony. More Help.
No Fear. Until his death, Augustus expanded the Roman empire more extensively than Pompey and Caesar and brought great wealth nd peace to Rome.
The senate regained its former status and Rome was transformed as a city. Arnold and Gibson a comparison of the effects of breast feeding and artificial likened the legacy of European Iron Age studies to a mist: a an analysis of the topic of caesar as a limited ruler scholarly mist Get information.
facts. Research essays. Augustus Caesar vs. Julius Caesar Essay Words | 3 Pages Augustus’ sustainable yet inclusive reign of power, combined with his ability to please and play to the Roman masses, permitted his reign as ruler to be far more secure than Julius Caesar’s.