Animal research cons

It is the process of animal testing that is done under the guise of research to benefit humanity, but the applied research may have little or no concern to the animals involved. Up to million animals, from fish to chimpanzees, may be used every year for the purpose of animal research. The advantage of animal research is that it puts no human lives at risk. Experiments can take place to determine if a product or idea will work as intended.

Animal research cons

OccupyTheory on 18 November, at Although animal activists primarily are concerned with the good and welfare of animals, advocates in favor of the research prioritize human lives and advancement in health.

Arguments on each side certainly have their compelling strengths. Pros of Animal Research To begin, research using animals may lead to new medications being discovered. Examples of medications that have been the result of animal testing are Penicillin, several asthma treatments, cancer and HIV drugs, vaccines, antibiotics, and insulin.

There are a good number of animal research opponents who are primarily against animals used in cosmetics testing, but not against using animals for testing with human health benefits. The most significant research today using animals pertains to diabetes and cancer using primarily mice.

Secondarily, rats, pigs, and sheep are used. Birds and fish are used less frequently. The animal which shares the most similar patterns for diabetes is a cat; cats who become overweight do indeed become predisposed to the same kind of diabetes that humans do in the same situation.

In Animal research cons, animals have similar enough bodily constitutions to make the comparisons relevant and effective. If an animal is chosen for a particular line of research, its DNA structure has been determined Animal research cons be similar to humans.

Pro: Life-Saving Medications and Vaccines

In this way, humans may be prevented from the harms that are caused to the animals during the testing. The animal tests serve as a precursor to the commencing trial tests done on humans. Also, if the research conducted is beneficial to humans, it may well be beneficial to animals.

If a cure for a condition is discovered, the animal reaps the benefits of the cure as well. Through animal testing, drugs have been developed to treat human and veterinary ailments.

Cons of Animal Research Using animals in research is a costly methodology. Often it is not even possible without the companies or organizations asking for outside funding from third parties. The costs of feeding, housing, caring for, and treating the animals must be considered, as well as the price of the animals in the first place.

Certain companies breed animals solely for this purpose. Additionally, the animals used in the experiments are in captivity, and may be harmed or killed. The substance being tested may well prove to be lethal for the animals, or the conditions during their captivity may lead to their deaths.

On top of that, some of the tests may never render any useful information at all, and therefore animal lives are sacrificed in vain, and no human benefit was derived. Before the passage of the AWA, the only laws constraining animal use in society forbade the purposeless, deviant, or even sadistic infliction of pain or suffering onto animals.

One argument that is considered seriously is that animals cannot provide consent to the testing to which they are being subjected.

Above all, though, is that the testing certainly can and often does involve the pain and suffering of the animals. When possible, researchers claim to take measures to prevent or minimize suffering, but there are times when providing, say, an anesthetic will change the interaction of the drug being tested.

Organizations such as People for the Ethical Treatment of Animals PETA have placed the opposition to animal research more clearly before the eyes of the public.

Animal research cons

In order to do so, they have publicized a number of animal tests that were urgently distasteful to the public, even if they were not examples of the norm in research: In the late s in England at Huntingdon Life Sciences facility, employees were recorded hitting and screaming at dogs, as well as doing sexually repulsive things during the taking of blood samples.

All of the accused and recorded staff involved were fired and prosecuted.Cons of Animal Research. Using animals in research is a costly methodology.

Often it is not even possible without the companies or organizations asking . Each research facility must set up an Institutional Animal Care and Use Committee (IACUC) that will approve all proposals to use animals for experimentation. The IACUC will be responsible for enforcing humane treatment of animals.

Opponents of animal testing say that it is cruel and inhumane to experiment on animals, that alternative methods available to researchers can replace animal testing, and that animals are so different from human beings that research on animals often yields irrelevant results.

On the contrary, animal research ethics and the integrity and morality of such tests have been questioned by environmentalists. Pros PETA (People for the Ethical Treatment of Animals) supporters will stand in unison against the support of animal testing.

Jun 13,  · Animal testing is a process that has been going on for centuries for numerous reasons, such as developing medical treatments, determining the toxicity of certain medications, confirming the safety of a product designed for humans, and other health care regardbouddhiste.com: April Klazema.

Jun 13,  · Animal testing is a process that has been going on for centuries for numerous reasons, such as developing medical treatments, determining the toxicity of certain medications, confirming the safety of a product designed for humans, and other health care regardbouddhiste.com: April Klazema.

Animal Testing Cons: What Every Person Should Know