Week 7 critical thinking questions psych

Can you think of any examples of adolescent egocentrism? Have you created any personal fables?

Week 7 critical thinking questions psych

Translate this page from English Print Page Change Text Size: T T T Critical Thinking: Critical thinking is essential to effective learning and productive living. Would you share your definition of critical thinking?

Critical Thinking - Language-n-Thought

First, since critical thinking can be defined in a number of different ways consistent with each other, we should not put a lot of weight on any one definition.

Definitions are at best scaffolding for the mind. With this qualification in mind, here is a bit of scaffolding: Two things are crucial: To put it briefly, it is self-improvement in thinking through standards that assess thinking.

Could you give me an example? Certainly, one of the most important distinctions that teachers need to routinely make, and which takes disciplined thinking to make, is that between reasoning and subjective reaction. If we are trying to foster quality thinking, we don't want students simply to assert things; we want them to try to reason things out on the basis of evidence and good reasons.

Often, teachers are unclear about this basic difference. Many teachers are apt to take student writing or speech which is fluent and witty or glib and amusing as good thinking. They are often unclear about the constituents of good reasoning.

Hence, even though a student may just be asserting things, not reasoning things out at all, if she is doing so with vivacity and flamboyance, teachers are apt to take this to be equivalent to good reasoning.

This was made clear in a recent California state-wide writing assessment in which teachers and testers applauded a student essay, which they said illustrated "exceptional achievement" in reasoned evaluation, an essay that contained no reasoning at all, that was nothing more than one subjective reaction after another.

See "Why Students-and Teachers-Don't Reason Well" The assessing teachers and testers did not notice that the student failed to respond to the directions, did not support his judgment with reasons and evidence, did not consider possible criteria on which to base his judgment, did not analyze the subject in the light of the criteria, and did not select evidence that clearly supported his judgment.

The result was, by the way, that a flagrantly mis-graded student essay was showcased nationally in ASCD's Developing Mindssystematically misleading theor so teachers who read the publication.

Could this possibly be a rare mistake, not representative of teacher knowledge? I don't think so. Let me suggest a way in which you could begin to test my contention. If you are familiar with any thinking skills programs, ask someone knowledgeable about it the "Where's the beef?

Critical Thinking: Basic Questions & Answers

Namely, "What intellectual standards does the program articulate and teach? And then when you explain what you mean, I think you will find that the person is not able to articulate any such standards. Thinking skills programs without intellectual standards are tailor-made for mis-instruction.

For example, one of the major programs asks teachers to encourage students to make inferences and use analogies, but is silent about how to teach students to assess the inferences they make and the strengths and weaknesses of the analogies they use.

Week 7 critical thinking questions psych

This misses the point. The idea is not to help students to make more inferences but to make sound ones, not to help students to come up with more analogies but with more useful and insightful ones.

What is the solution to this problem? How, as a practical matter, can we solve it? Well, not with more gimmicks or quick fixes. Not with more fluff for teachers. Only with quality long-term staff development that helps the teachers, over an extended period of time, over years not months, to work on their own thinking and come to terms with what intellectual standards are, why they are essential, and how to teach for them.

The State Department in Hawaii has just such a long-term, quality, critical thinking program see " mentor program ".Furthermore, critical thinking, because it involves our working out afresh our own thinking on a subject, and because our own thinking is always a unique product of our self-structured experience, ideas, and reasoning, is intrinsically a new "creation", a new "making", a .

Follow this Study Plan as you work your way through the online materials. Check all that apply: Print the Chapter Outline and bring it to lecture to help organize your notes.; Take the Chapter Quizzes to test your knowledge.

Examine the feedback, then review your notes and re-read sections in your textbook or ebook that correspond to questions . Critical thinking is a process: Involves wide range of skills and attributes: Identifying other people’s positions, arguments and conclusions.

Evaluating the evidence for alternative points of view. If there are critical periods for the acquisition of language, what does this imply about the way we teach foreign languages in our schools?

Are children who grow up in bilingual homes likely to be confused and at a disadvantage in language development, or do they benefit from the exposure?

Course Goals

Critical thinking means making reasoned judgments that are logical and well-thought out. It is a way of thinking in which you don't simply accept all arguments and conclusions you are exposed to. Learn critical thinking psychology chapter 7 with free interactive flashcards. Choose from different sets of critical thinking psychology chapter 7 flashcards on Quizlet.

Critical Thinking - Intelligence